![]() Hm, just wish I knew how they worked), or outright disingenuous (AutoCAD on Linux would rock because it would use more efficient code!).įor people who want AutoCAD for, they should first answer these questions:ġ. Look, all the hip folks in the coffee shop run them. These arguments are at least knee-jerk reflexive (I hate Windows, so anything else must be better), completely ill-informed (Man, those Macs are sexy beasts. Like their work would be 200% faster if it were just on another platform. Some people think that the source of all of their performance problems lie with Windows, as if Microsoft’s poor coding practices was the sole cause of all AutoCAD crashes, long load times, slow rendering rates and so on. Do you run only apps for a particular favored OS, or do you pick your apps first and OS second? ![]() Unfortunately, it just doesn’t make commercial sense, and wishing it did will not make it so.Īs with the Mac, Linux poses the same chicken-before-the-egg argument. It’s expensive to do and expensive to go on supporting in the long term. Linux? Great, why not? The reality is that it’s not that easy. I dislike the Windows monopoly and support the open source movement, so I would love it if Autodesk could just snap its fingers and provide all its software on whatever platforms the users want. In any case, it is likely that most Mac or Linux users of AutoCAD wouldn’t be new customers, simply existing users using a different OS. While the Windows share is currently falling (thanks, Vista) and the others are steadily rising, there’s a long way to go before Linux has the numbers to make the investment worthwhile. Current PC OS market share is running something like this: I know personally of customers who were caught up in that enthusiasm and invested heavily in a Unix environment, only to bitterly regret it a few years later when Autodesk abandoned them. I remember Autodesk being very enthusiastic about the Sparc port in particular (AIX, too). Autodesk hasn’t just failed in the past with AutoCAD for the Mac, it has failed with AutoCAD for Unix, too. Why? First of all, for most of the same reasons I gave for the Mac port. ![]() Again, I think it would be bad for everybody: Autodesk, AutoCAD for Windows users, and most of all, AutoCAD for Linux users. Just like AutoCAD for the Mac, while I can sympathise with the users of that OS, I think a native port of AutoCAD for Linux would be a bad idea. It is available in these languages: English, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Brazilian Portuguese, Turkish, and Russian.I often see calls for Autodesk to support AutoCAD on Linux. DraftSight uses Graebert's ARES as its platform, based on Qt. DraftSight for Windows was released in February 2011 and has been downloaded more than 1,8 million times as of December 2011. A DXF file is used to convert CAD files to a generic format that can be read by other CAD software products.ĭraftSight competes in the market with more than three dozen hybrid 2D or 2D / 3D products. The product was developed by Dassault Systèmes and allows users to create, edit and view DWG and DXF files.Ī DWG file contains the binary data for CAD design and is the drawing format for many CAD programs. Compatible with: Windows 32 and 64 bits, GNU / Linux (Packages for Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse and Mandriva.) And Mac OS X.ĭraftSight is a free proprietary 2D CAD (Computer Aided Design) program for engineers, architects, designers, students, and educators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |